Web8 Mar 2024 · section 588FA(3) of the Corporations Act does not incorporate the peak indebtedness rule and a liquidator should not be allowed to choose the "start date" of a continuing business relationship. The relevant period is either the period within the six-month relation-back period when the continuing business relationship started or when the … WebThe Full Federal Court in MJ Woodman has now clarified the position, deciding that where a creditor has received an unfair preference under s 588FA of the Act, that creditor may not …
PREFERENCES: PEAK INDEBTEDNESS RULE ABOLISHED…FOR NOW
WebCORPORATIONS ACT 2001 - SECT 588FA Unfair preferences (1) A transaction is an unfair preference given by a company to a creditor of the company if, and only if: (a) the company and the creditor are parties to the transaction (even if someone else is also a party); and WebIntroduction. In preference proceedings under section 588FA, Corporations Act, or section 122 Bankruptcy Act, liquidators or trustees in bankruptcy seeking to recover alleged preferential payments made to a creditor prior to the debtor’s winding up or bankruptcy, will often learn that payments to the creditor have been made by a third party as opposed to … tesco fresh turkey crown
High Court hands down important unfair preference decisions ...
http://www5.austlii.edu.au/au/legis/cth/consol_act/ca2001172/s588ff.html http://www5.austlii.edu.au/au/legis/cth/consol_act/ca2001172/s588fe.html Web4 Apr 2024 · Under section 588FA of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth), an unfair preference is defined as a transaction, such as payment of an outstanding debt, between a company and a unsecured creditor which results in that unsecured creditor receiving more than it would have received if it had to prove in the winding up of the debtor company. It is unfair … trimethylxanthine pronounce